One of the more interesting players to start the season has been Matt Garza. I've never been a huge Garza fan and I thought the Cubs grossly overpaid. The players they gave up look especially better now than they did at the time of the deal and include:
Sam Fuld (Y'already know)
Hak-Ju Lee (BA's #92 prospect. Hitting .452 in his first 10 games in High-A)
Chris Archer (BA's #27 prospec)
Brandon Guyer and Robinson Chirinos... but mostly those other 2 guys with big payoffs from Sam Fuld thus far.
I didn't like it then, and I'm still not sure I like it despite the fact that Garza is racking up an obscene amount of strikeouts.
Garza had a very interesting first start of the season. Against the Pirates he went 7 innings, struck out 12, and walked none. By almost any means, a fantastic start. The only problem was he also allowed 12 hits which lead to 3 runs. (Because, Pirates)
That trend continued in his next start, against Milwuakee. 5.2 innings, 8 strikeouts, 3 walks, and 8 hits allowed which lead to 5 runs. (Because, Milwuakee!)
However, Garza has been improving as the season goes along. (Improving on a 12 K, 0 BB performance) by allowing fewer hits in each of his starts. In his last start against Colorado he went 6 innings, allowed 3 hits, struck out 7 and walked 1.
What can fantasy owners expect going forward?
The difficult part about projecting Garza, is that so far he is a different pitcher than he was in Minnesota and Tampa Bay. Garza was throwing his fastball more than 70% of the time in Tampa and now he's only throwing it 54% of the time. He's using his slider, curve, and change-up much more, mixing his pitches in a way he never had before.
Garza has never been under 4.00 FIP or 4.00 xFIP in his career, but is currently sitting on a major-league leading 1.24 FIP and a major-league leading 1.93 xFIP. Many of the numbers that matter in fantasy however, have been left unaffected, or worse. His 4.11 ERA. His 1.47 WHIP.
However, in leagues that count K/9, BB/9, or K/BB, Garza has been a beast. Currently at 12.03, 2.64, and 4.56, respectively. (And respectfully)
The BABIP against Garza is a major league worst .414. That should be expected to drop ~100 points and the WHIP and hits allowed will go down. He's also inducing a career high 50% grounders and a career low 21% fly balls, none of which have left the park.
Going into the season, I would have had Garza ranked something along the lines of "Must be owned, nothing special" category. (60-70th best fantasy SP?) ERA didn't kill you, had a past of higher strikeouts than the 6.60 he put up in 2010, moving into the NL.
If I updated that thought now, I'd have to move him at least into the 20's with the idea that Garza could be the breakout pitcher of 2011.
I wouldn't "sell high" on Garza right now. I'd hang on and wait for the ERA and WHIP to improve, which they will as long as he sticks to this current gameplan.
Loading comments...