Seth Smith Fantasy Outlook: Fantasy gold or irrelevant platoon player?

Ron Chenoy-USA TODAY Sports

Smith has quietly put up impressive numbers this season, but circumstance could limit his fantasy value.

Without looking it up, tell me who's second in the majors in OPS this season.

It's not Jose Bautista, the suddenly red-hot Yasiel Puig or even Giancarlo Stanton. No, it's San Diego Padres outfielder Seth Smith, who has a 1.042 OPS in 120 at-bats spanning 38 games. Given that knowledge, why is he owned in 38.2 percent of ESPN leagues? He could become (presumably) the first hitter to qualify for the batting title with an OPS over 1.000 while also being owned in less than half of fantasy leagues.

Alas, despite his impressive percentage statistics, Smith isn't particularly relevant in the fantasy landscape for a number of reasons. Most importantly, he plays on the Padres, who are hitting .221 as a team (dead last in the majors) and have scored 133 runs (second-worst) thanks to an atrocious .279 OBP.

In other words, Smith has been essentially the lone bright spot on the team, and as such, he hasn't received many RBI opportunities. In fact, no other hitter ranking in the top 15 in the majors in OPS has fewer RBI than Smith's 17 on the season, and among that same group of hitters, only Chase Utley has fewer home runs.

The obvious issue is that Smith is essentially a platoon player. He has just 11 at-bats against left-handers this season, which severely limits his value because he misses out on a ton of playing time.

20140423_jla_bd3_130.jpg.0_mediumDenis Poroy/Getty Images

So, what do we make of this? On one hand, Smith has been statistically one of the best hitters in baseball this season, but his fantasy production hasn't reflected as much. He's 146 on ESPN's player rater, thanks to his lack of counting stats. Aside from the lack of home runs and RBI, Smith has scored 18 runs and has yet to even attempt a steal since 2012.

The short answer to the previous question is that it really depends on your league. If you get rewarded for high on-base percentage or OPS in general, or get penalized for strikeouts, Smith is an excellent bench player. The Padres offense can also really only improve from here on out, and it's hard to believe that a player who qualifies for the batting title with an OPS over 1.000 will continue his pace for just 61 RBI. Everth Cabrera has a .273 OBP, which is well below what he's put up in the past, and as that number inevitably goes up, so too will Smith's RBI opportunities. Also, if he continues to put up number like this, it's hard to imagine he'll continue to see such limited playing time.

For the time being, Smith is a much stronger option in NL-only leagues, as he's less likely to be relevant in mixed leagues with so many options at the outfield position.

Also, as previously mentioned, Smith is owned in just 38.2 percent of ESPN leagues, which means there's a decent chance he's available in your league. He might not be a valuable commodity just yet, but as the season goes on, Smith has a good chance of becoming much more relevant fantasy-wise.

Latest News

In This Article


Trending Discussions

Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Fake Teams

You must be a member of Fake Teams to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Fake Teams. You should read them.

Join Fake Teams

You must be a member of Fake Teams to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Fake Teams. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.