Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

MLB Trade Rumors: Did the Cardinals Try to Trade Albert Pujols

This weekend, we heard from Albert Pujols' camp that he will veto any trade proposals this season. Here is an excerpt from Buster Olney's ESPN article:

Other teams have asked the Cardinals about Albert Pujols in the past, making sure that if St. Louis ever thought about dealing the perennial MVP candidate, the inquiring team's interest was established.

The Cardinals have never really pursued any of that trade discussion.

But no matter what happens in the last days of negotiations before Pujols arrives at the Cardinals' camp in spring training, the slugger will not be traded.The understanding within the St. Louis front office is that Pujols will not accept any trade going forward, according to sources. He has the right to veto any trade proposal, and would do so. This means there are only two possible results in the negotiations in the Pujols talks: Either he signs a contract extension with the Cardinals, or he will become a free agent this coming fall.

Olney states that the Cardinals have never really pursued trading Pujols. What I want to know is, why would Pujols' agent feel the need to announce that Pujols would veto any trade proposal if the Cardinals didn't try to trade him?

More offseason thoughts after the jump:

Star-divide

Other Offseason Thoughts

Josh Johnson was one of the best starting pitchers in baseball in 2010. But fantasy owners may want to see how he pitches in spring training, as ESPN's Stephania Bell has opined that owners should proceed with caution should they draft him this year. Here is a quote from Matthew Berry's top 200 over at ESPN:

76. Josh Johnson: Stephania Bell says there are major injury concerns here. Given how deep starting pitching is this year, that risk just keeps dropping him in my rankings.

Major concerns? Maybe the Marlins didn't fully disclose the extent of his shoulder discomfort last September. MLB.com states the he was shut down on September 13th for the rest of the season with a mid-back strain and right shoulder inflammation.

Now that the Rangers have traded for C/1B/DH Mike Napoli, and signed him to a $5.8 million one year deal, does this mean Michael Young is back on the trade block? I saw Ken Rosenthal on the MLB channel the other night stating that the Rockies are still interested. Why? Are they going to play him at 1B? They already have signed Jose Lopez and Ty Wigginton this offseason.

On Friday, the Mets ownership announced they were looking to sell up to 25% of the team, but as I read somewhere this weekend, what investor would invest a couple hundred mill and not have a say in the durection of the team? I guess it is entirely possible the Wilpons will sell the team.

Speaking of the Mets, as a result of the ownership situation, could the Mets deal Jose Reyes and Carlos Beltran before the trade deadline this year? I think both will be traded, and my guess is that Beltran will be traded to an AL team where he can DH some. And I think Reyes could be traded to the Reds as they have plenty of prospects in their farm system who are blocked including Todd Frazier, Yonder Alonso and Mike Leake possibly. Plus, the Reds need a shortstop and leadoff hitter and Reyes fills both of those holes.

Poll
Will the Mets trade Jose Reyes by July 31st?
Yes
154 votes
No
76 votes

230 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 8 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Reading something that's not there

“What I want to know is, why would Pujols’ agent feel the need to announce that Pujols would veto any trade proposal if the Cardinals didn’t try to trade him?”

Where does it say anywhere, in Olney’s article or otherwise, that the agent announced this?

The Cardinals’ front office understands that Pujols will not accept a trade, because it doesn’t make any sense for him to accept a trade. “According to sources” might as well be Olney’s cat.

I write a Cardinals blog, Pitchers Hit Eighth.

by Pitchers Hit Eighth on Feb 1, 2011 9:40 AM EST reply actions  

It just seems odd

The odd part is why the Pujols camp felt it pertinent to announce that he would veto any trade… thats the odd part.

Is is possible that the club approached him in a general way and asked if he would approve a trade to anywhere in the league if the two sides couldn’t agree on a contract extension? Possible (albeit unlikely).

by Bluethunder33 on Feb 1, 2011 10:43 AM EST up reply actions  

assumptions

Again, you’re making an assumption that the Pujols camp “announced” anything. Where has that been reported?

I write a Cardinals blog, Pitchers Hit Eighth.

by Pitchers Hit Eighth on Feb 2, 2011 12:49 AM EST up reply actions  

maybe they announced it

to the Cards front office? Olney doesn’t state his source, but you have to beleive it was one of the parties, right?

Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.sbnation.com
www.minorleagueball.com

by Ray Guilfoyle on Feb 2, 2011 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

his source is Joe Strauss, from the Post-Dispatch, months ago

…and there’s also this from Matthew Leach

http://twitter.com/#!/MatthewHLeach/statuses/32687493266546688

I write a Cardinals blog, Pitchers Hit Eighth.

by Pitchers Hit Eighth on Feb 3, 2011 12:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Leverage

The answer, I think, is leverage: Pujols has already set a deadline to get a deal done. By announcing he won’t accept a trade (now or by the trading deadline), it closes any possible sliver of a door that would be open for the Cardinals to trade him this summer.

Of course, the likelihood of a trade wasn’t big to begin with, but with NO possibility, it puts the tiniest bit more pressure on the Cardinals to get the deal done by spring training. I think it was almost a formality for Pujols’ agent to announce it, but I think it’s not a matter of a past proposal, but creating as much leverage as possible.

by AGuinness on Feb 1, 2011 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

agreed – makes sense.

by Bluethunder33 on Feb 1, 2011 1:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Mets in July

As a Braves fan I hope they are stuck with the albatross contracts of Beltran and Bay for the life of them. I do see them moving Reyes as he holds the most value of someone not named David Wright (who I don’t see them moving)

by jerzbravesboy24 on Feb 1, 2011 10:28 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog covering Fantasy Baseball, Fantasy Football, Fantasy Hockey, Fantasy Basketball and Fantasy MMA.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who wins this Keeper Trade?
140__2__small
BaseballProspectus.com hacked
Small
Non-Keeper Trade
Small
Should I??
Patal_small
More Dynasty Trading
Small
In search of closers
Small
Fair Trade
140__2__small
Is Christian Friedrich for real?
Patal_small
Dynasty Trade Help
Small
Trade Help! Kinsler/King Felix

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Img00006-20101226-1702_small Ray Guilfoyle

Editors

Dsc00490_-_version_2_small Jason Hunt

Imag0397_small PostmanMatt

897267_o_small Kenneth Arthur

23-tmb_small dukeallstar

Small eklevine

Beer_small Michael Barr

Markus_fltc_fav30_small Markus Potter

To_crying_small smokeymcpots

5456_556618485132_20100932_33160415_3487226_n_small mahoney1213

Calvin-and-hobbes_small Robert L. Bishop

Image-1_small ZombieMonta

Small MikeGallagher

Coolguy_small stephenkaczmar

Bwhead_small Ben Bauman

Twitter_small JustBlogGuy

Bruce_campbell_army_of_darkness_small Paul Rice

Fixed_small Chris Buckley

Photo_18_small Kevin Boger

2011-03-10_at_13-38-09__1__small Todd McMacken

Small Craig Goldstein

Raptors_small Maxmillien

Twitter_eb_2_small Marc Normandin

Vikingpose_reasonably_small_small bretsayre

Small Craig Brown

Authors

New_headshot_small Dave Halprin