Fantasy Boom or Bust: Desmond Jennings
If you're a baseball fan and you have a pulse, you probably had your eyes fixated on your television or computer screen during the utter craziness that was the final day of the regular season, September 28, 2011. Four teams entered that day with their seasons on the line, and when the dust had finally settled and the blood had dried, both the Red Sox and Braves had completed epic collapses and the Rays and Cardinals shockingly found themselves in the playoffs.
The last image from that night was of Evan Longoria sprinting around the bases and into a pile of his hysterical teammates. Longoria's game-ending home run resulted in the Tampa Bay Rays improbably leap-frogging their richer AL East dwellers from Boston after having been ten games behind just a month before. However, the Rays would never have been in that spot if not for a mid-year, season-changing call up: that of one Desmond Delane Jennings.
Desmond Jennings was crowned the Rays' heir apparent to Carl Crawford from seemingly the day he was drafted. As a speedy, five-tool outfield prospect, he seemed to be a perfect replica to insert in left field when Crawford inevitably left for free agency. That's exactly what happened, but while Crawford was busy torpedoing Boston's season, Jennings may have saved Tampa's.
Jennings began the year by repeating AAA, after his development stalled with a subpar, injury-marred season there in 2010. When the Rays finally realized that Sam Fuld couldn't hit (and when Jennings' arbitration clock had been sufficiently delayed), Jennings got the call on July 23rd and Tampa Bay's season changed course. With Jennings entrenched in the leadoff spot, the Rays went 39-25 down the stretch to bull their way into the playoffs. Where before the Ray's left field situation had been the great wall of suck, Jennings changed all of that. He absolutely tore it up in August, hitting .333/.415/.611, showing almost a Rickey Henderson-ish combination of skills at the top of the order.
Jennings has always been described as a Crawford clone, only with less contact skill but more power and patience. He definitely fit that bill last season, sporting a .358 OBP while bashing ten home runs in two months (Crawford has only topped .358 once in his career). He was also a terror on the bases, stealing 20 bases, and he likely has a future as a center fielder if the Rays trade or non-tender B.J. Upton. So he has a power/speed combo and is probably going to be toiling at a premium position before too long. That means he has rotisserie stud written all over him, right? What's not to like?
Not so fast, buddy. Jennings slumped miserably in September, OPSing an unspeakable .504. While some of that might have been BABIP shenanigans (.195 for the month!), he was basically worthless with the bat in the final month and his power completely dried up (though he did hit two bombs in the playoffs). Also, if you're looking for a perennial .300 hitter, look elsewhere. He's seen as more of a power-and-walks guy than a player who will contend for batting titles on a yearly basis.
Verdict: Boom. Look, I love the guy. I think he projects to be even better than Crawford and I think he's got a 25-homer, 50-steal season or two in him. He has good plate awareness, draws his share of walks, and he should be a high-OBP guy and, by extension, give you a good OPS. All of the talent was on full display last August. If you can stomach some relatively low batting averages, you'll get big production in all of the other relevant categories. He's going to be a star and he's going to be worthy of a high-mid-round pick as soon as this season.
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Better than Crawford?
That’s ballsy. Crawford was one hell of a player. Jennings was 25 this year, which isn’t young in prospect terms. You look at most of the elite players and they are normally in the majors around 21-22 years old. How much better can Jennings get? He isn’t that from his peak years.
True...
…but a lot of his development was delayed because of injuries that plagued him in the minors. It’s possible I’m drinking the kool-aid of his August surge, but I think Jennings has more power than Crawford which, combined with 50-60 steal ability, would put him at least at Crawford’s level. I agree that those are lofty expectations, but I’m a big fan and think highly of his potential.
Your writing is the only thing giving your alcoholism any credibility. -Stewie Griffin
What is more realistic?
The 7 home runs he hit in one month on a 25% HR/FB rate or the previous years of data which suggest that he is no where near that level? I’ll bet on the larger sample size.
by dudedudedude on Nov 27, 2011 10:18 PM EST up reply actions
or the 12 home runs
he hit in 89 games in AAA? He did hit 22 home runs in 2011 between AAA and the big leagues. Fluke? maybe, but it isn’t like he didn’t hit for power till he made it to the big leagues.
An old scouting report from BA:
Jennings has a lethal combination of speed and power that, combined with an aggressive approach and impressive overall knowledge, makes him a true game-changer. Managers rated Jennings as the best and fastest baserunner in the Southern League, as well as the best defensive outfielder and most exciting player. He has a live, athletic frame and five-tool talent that should continue to improve with experience. He has more power than most leadoff hitters, with at least 15-homer potential, and even better, he understands that his pop is secondary in importance to getting on base.
I am interested to see if he will hit for more power next year.
Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Nov 27, 2011 11:04 PM EST up reply actions
How many 24-25 year old's can do that in AAA?
If he was 20 and playing like that, sure, but he is much older than most elite prospects.
by dudedudedude on Nov 27, 2011 11:15 PM EST up reply actions
because
the Rays were conservative in bringing him up and he did have a hand injury in 2010, which affected his power.
Chase Utley didn’t become a major league regular till he was 25.
The league average for Low A is around 20-21. How many 20 year olds make it to AAA?
Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Nov 27, 2011 11:27 PM EST up reply actions
When you think of superstars...
They aren’t normally 25. There is obvious exceptions like Utley but have a look around the league. The Rays are conservative when they don’t feel the prospect is ready, but Longoria and Moore haven’t had any issues.
by dudedudedude on Nov 27, 2011 11:35 PM EST up reply actions
Jennings
Wasn’t “ready” because he was hurt in 2010 and because the Rays didn’t want to start his arb clock by bringing him up to start this season.
Your writing is the only thing giving your alcoholism any credibility. -Stewie Griffin
This service clock stuff is garbage
Yes, the Rays wanted to wait on him this season, but he could have easily been pushed through levels quicker if they felt he was ready. Look at say, Brett Lawrie for example. He was good enough to be pushed through levels quickly so that he was ready at the age of 21. Jennings was not.
by dudedudedude on Nov 27, 2011 11:51 PM EST up reply actions
Moore
wasn’t he ready coming into the 2011 season? I think he was.
I agree, most superstars push their way to the majors, but with Crawford and Upton ahead of him, there was not reason to rush Jennings, and the hand injury in 2010 did not help.
Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Nov 27, 2011 11:39 PM EST up reply actions
Seriously?
A pitcher who had never pitched in anything above high A with a history of command issues was ready to pitch in the AL East? I beg to differ.
by dudedudedude on Nov 27, 2011 11:49 PM EST up reply actions
Longoria
Was held in the minors for a month in 2008 for the sole purpose of delaying his service time. It caused a mini-controversy, which the Rays quickly snuffed out by giving him a long term deal. The Rays are notorious for this and they do it quite a bit. David Price also comes to mind…
Your writing is the only thing giving your alcoholism any credibility. -Stewie Griffin
Fine, call him up a month earlier
He’s still 24.
by dudedudedude on Nov 28, 2011 12:06 AM EST up reply actions
seriously
he wasn’t challenged in AA or AAA, or any level for that matter, and apparently the Rangers weren;t a challenge either….yes, I understand the SSS, but he could have been called up before September.
Dwight Gooden made it to the big leagues after one year in Low A. Why he was left in Low A to strike out 300 batters in 191 innings is beyond me.
Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Nov 27, 2011 11:58 PM EST up reply actions
That's absurd
You’re ready to throw your top prospect into the flame when you already have a full rotation and are unsure if he can make it. Yes, he did perform exceptionally well, but the jump from A ball to the majors is huge, and unheard of in today’s game. He might have been better than Wade Davis to start the season, but I’m sure if you threw Davis back in A ball, he would perform at a level close to Moore did.
by dudedudedude on Nov 28, 2011 12:06 AM EST up reply actions
Isn't that...
…basically what the Reds did with Mike Leake? He seems to be doing fine.
Your writing is the only thing giving your alcoholism any credibility. -Stewie Griffin
One is a future stud, one is an innings eater
Do you want Matt Moore the innings eater or Matt Moore the stud?
by dudedudedude on Nov 28, 2011 12:17 AM EST up reply actions
Pujols
jumped from A ball to the bigs…..
Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Nov 28, 2011 6:08 AM EST up reply actions
Are you not seeing the type of players your listing here?
Pujols is arguably the best hitter we’ve ever seen.
by dudedudedude on Nov 28, 2011 9:56 AM EST up reply actions
yeah so
just stating a fact that was relevant to this conversation. There are many others.
and your reason why Moore was brought up slowly applies to Jennings as well, they were both blocked and there was no reason to rush them.
Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Nov 28, 2011 10:13 AM EST up reply actions
My god Ray
You’re just listing outliers. Compare them to the average player, not the best players we’ve seen, because as far as we know, they aren’t the best players of their generation.
by dudedudedude on Nov 28, 2011 10:16 AM EST up reply actions
pujols
Did you know he would be a hall of famer after one year of A ball? Highly doubt it.
Its not like jennings and moore are unheard of.
Ray Guilfoyle
www.faketeams.com
www.minorleagueball.com
www.mlbdailydish.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Nov 28, 2011 10:23 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
No one knew
But it doesn’t change the fact that he is an extremely good player.
by dudedudedude on Nov 28, 2011 10:28 AM EST up reply actions

by 


































