A Closer Look: Marlins Outfielder Mike Stanton
I am back at it after a taking a day to relax after the big party at my house on Saturday. I wrote about Mike Stanton in Saturday's post, and wanted to take a closer look at his hitting stats this season.
Stanton has been pretty hot of late, raising his triple slash line to .275-.346-.569 after his 2-4 performance on Sunday. For the season, Stanton has hit 14 HRs and driven in 39 runs in 204 at bats. He also has more extra base hits-31-than singles-25. According to ESPN, he is on pace to hit 26 HRs and drive in 71 in 372 at bats, yet he is only owned in 58% of their leagues.
Taking a closer look at Stanton, I found that since the All-Star break, he is hitting .315-.417-.717 with 9 HRs, 19 RBIs, and a 25-16 K/BB rate. Only 3 other hitters have hit more HRs than Stanton since the ASB-Jose Bautista, Dan Uggla and Luke Scott, but only one-Bautista-has a higher SLG. The fact that he is walking more is a huge positive for a guy with his power and strikeout tendencies.
Stanton is striking out almost 35% of his at bats, but is walking at a 10% clip, which is acceptable for a 20 year old. His BABIP is .339, which is reasonable for a guy who strikes out so much. His ISO is an amazing .295. One peripheral stat that stands out for me is his FB%, which at 38% is low for a power hitter. But his LD% of 21% is solid. His HR/FB% sits at 28%, which is good, but when you consider that 24% of his flyballs have been of the infield variety, his real HR/FB% is higher. A top of my head calculation tells me his HR/FB% is closer to 50% if you back out his infield fly balls. That certainly is a small sample size, but it does give you an indication as to how much power Stanton has.
On Sunday, manager Edwin Rodriguez moved Stanton up to 5th in the order, with the thought that he will have more RBI opportunities hitting higher in the lineup. According to CBS Sportsline, Stanton is leading all rookies in homers and RBIs, and is second in doubles, yet I have yet to hear his name mentioned in NL Rookie of the Year talk. Stanton may change that in the next month and a half.
Coming into the 2010 season, the scouting reports on Stanton was that he has the potential to hit 40 HRs in a season. I even read one wild report that he could hit 50 HRs in a season. Now that doesn't appear so wild, but will take some time.
Going into 2011 drafts, I am starting to wonder if he could be a 35-40 HR hitter as soon as next season. Maybe this is just a hot streak for Stanton, and he will regress back to being a strikeout machine for the rest of the season. As someone stated recently, I wonder what type of projection Bill James will have on Stanton this offseason.
I own Stanton in the UBA keeper league, so maybe I am talking my book, but I could see Stanton getting drafted in the 5th-7th rounds in mixed leagues in 2011, and much sooner in NL-only leagues.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You hear
about guys who come up that have “power” and then they have some nice pop but it takes a year before it really translates.. well this kid is the real deal when it comes to power hitters. No doubt. Although you’d like to see him hit a few less “Just Enoughs” and a few more “No Doubters” based on Hit tracker.
by TheHuntforRedOctober on Aug 16, 2010 12:32 PM EDT reply actions
good point
I looked at that also. But about half of his HRs would have been out of all 30 major league ballparks.
raygu
www.faketeams.com
www.sbnation.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Aug 16, 2010 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions
not a typo
I could be wrong, but some guys who K alot, have above average BABIP….time will tell.
raygu
www.faketeams.com
www.sbnation.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Aug 16, 2010 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions
its reasonable
.339 is not unreasonable – anything higher than that though is likely unsustainable over an entire season but over 500 AB I think Stanton could be in the .315-.335 range for his BABIP.
by Bluethunder33 on Aug 16, 2010 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Hrm
I wholeheartedly disagree that his .339 BABIP is something he’s going to sustain going forward, but it’s nitpicking. He’s a great power OF and will be for a longgggggggggg time. Even when that BABIP normalizes back down he’s going to have great numbers.
I take that back
A cursory glance at BABIP leaders from last year (and David Wright’s profile) shows me it is absolutely possible. Now is it likely? I dunno. More digging required.
I doubted this kid for a while
But he is getting it at this level. He is here to stay. And next year he is going to be huge. Top 5 OF easy.
He is not immune to the learning curve
I watched the Red vs. Marlins series this past weekend and Stanton was absolutely on fire. He played excellent defense as well.
I think it will come down to adjustments – Gordon Beckham said it best this year – he stated something about a comfort level that lets you adjust once the pitchers adjust to you. This makes the constant cat-and-mouse easier and adjustments can be made quicker.
He will struggle like all very young hitters do – but we will also see flashes of what is possible like what he has done over the past few weeks (In my keeper league is is a top-5 overall player over the previous 2 weeks).
Heyward is kind of showing the ups and downs that we can expect to see from Stanton as well.
He is a student of the game, a work-out nut, and has a great attitude – all great attributes that can lead him into that superstar class…
by Bluethunder33 on Aug 16, 2010 5:30 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm torn between keeping Mike Stanton or Ian Kinsler.
by Kenneth Arthur on Aug 17, 2010 12:01 PM EDT reply actions
Stanton
I would keep Stanton simply because Kinsler can’t stay on the field to contribute. Last year was a great year for him but he can’t contribute if he isn’t on the field.
Stanton is safer and has much higher upside I would say in just about any format.
by Bluethunder33 on Aug 17, 2010 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, its just difficult because dropping Kinsler has already burned me once!
I’ve got Mauer/Fielder/Kinsler/Wright/Heyward/Stanton/Bruce/Felix
Bruce wont be kept. Got to be Kinsler or Stanton I suspect.
by Kenneth Arthur on Aug 18, 2010 2:15 PM EDT up reply actions
I would seriously consider drop Mauer and Kinsler from that group. I think Bruce is still super young and has just as much upside as anyone you are thinking of keeping. An outfield of Heyward, Stanton, Bruce could really be dynamite (2012).
If you have the chance to trade to get high draft picks, I would look to move Mauer and Kinsler so you don’t get nothing by just dropping them. Or see what you can get for Mauer and Kinsler (could you get an excellent OF guy for those two? depends on your league but would love to have a Braun, Crawford, etc. in there and then feel better about dropping Bruce – or include Bruce in a 3 for 1 trade to a team that needs some impact guys and get an upgrade in return)…
Just my opinion.
by Bluethunder33 on Aug 19, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions
Not that I disagree with the assessmant of Mauer v Bruce, but I couldn't keep Mauer over Bruce just for the fact that based on what they've done at this point I know that I could trade Mauer FOR Bruce and another player next season.
He’s just more valuable right now. And outfield being the deepest position. Too late to make trades.
by Kenneth Arthur on Aug 19, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Keeping Stanton
In my league, I can keep up to seven players at 2010 price plus $5 or, if not drafted in 2010, at 2011 book value. Stanton will be kept regardless of what book value turns out to be.
agreed
wher does Book value come from?
raygu
www.faketeams.com
www.sbnation.com
by Ray Guilfoyle on Aug 17, 2010 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions

by 































