Fantasy Baseball: Midseason First Baseman Rankings
Below you'll find our midseason first basemen rankings. Brian (bluethunder33) has been added to the rankings corps for a fourth perspective, which is nice to have.
As always, remember that these rankings are the order in which we would like to own these players from this point forward.
| Rank | Player | Ray | Jason | Brian | Seth | Average |
| 1 | Albert Pujols | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 2 | Miguel Cabrera | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 3 | Ryan Howard | 4 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 4.75 |
| T-4 | Justin Morneau | 3 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 5.25 |
| T-4 | Mark Teixeira | 5 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 5.25 |
| 6 | Prince Fielder | 6 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| 7 | Joey Votto | 9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6.5 |
| 8 | Kevin Youkilis | 7 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 6.5 |
| 9 | Adrian Gonzalez | 8 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 6.75 |
| 10 | Mark Reynolds | 13 | 10 | 10 | 14 | 11.75 |
| 11 | Adam Dunn | 14 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 12 |
| 12 | Billy Butler | 11 | 16 | 14 | 12 | 13.25 |
| 13 | Pablo Sandoval | 10 | 15 | 13 | 16 | 13.5 |
| 14 | Paul Konerko | 18 | 13 | 11 | 13 | 13.75 |
| 15 | Carlos Pena | 12 | NR | 15 | 15 | 15.75 |
| 16 | Troy Glaus | 19 | 11 | 19 | 17 | 16.5 |
| 17 | Adam LaRoche | 17 | NR | NR | 11 | 17.5 |
| T-18 | David Ortiz | NR | 17 | 16 | 18 | 18 |
| T-18 | Derrek Lee | 16 | 14 | NR | NR | 18 |
| 20 | Lance Berkman | 15 | 20 | 20 | 19 | 18.5 |
| 21 | James Loney | 20 | 18 | 17 | NR | 19 |
| 22 | Justin Smoak | NR | 19 | 18 | 20 | 19.5 |
Doing these rankings made me realize one thing: first base is incredibly deep. Picking and choosing the end of my 20 was difficult to do, those who just missed out were deserving to make the list--there just weren't enough spots.
As I saw it there was a clear tier of 9: Pujols and Cabrera, followed by the other seven players that make up our 3-9 rankings. It appears that everyone agreed with this--while we all ranked the the 3-9 players quite differently, no other player made the top 9 on any of our lists. While I do have an order of preference for those players, I must confess there is little difference between them. If I were to acquire Mark Teixeira today (my No. 9-ranked player) I would have no qualms about it.
Also, I have seen rankings with Miguel Cabrera ahead of Pujols recently, though I had no hesitation in putting Albert No. 1. When he sent in his rankings, Jason said, "I couldn't quite do it, but 1 and 2 are essentially 1 and 1A to me." I wonder how many people feel similarly.
The back 11 were a real mix and match, and its interesting to see where everyone put them. Clearly, Jason is a fan of Troy Glaus, Ray is a Pablo Sandoval believer, and I love me some Adam LaRoche.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Howard
I ranked him high because he had a great 2nd half last season, and i can see him having another good 2nd half this season. The Phils are starting to score some runs now and they have just completed the toughest part of their schedule.
raygu
www.faketeams.com
www.sbnation.com
Glaus
He looks like he is finally healthy again, I am a big believer.
It’s also interesting to see how deep it really is – Butler is barely a starter in a 12-team league in our rankings, but clearly would still be a play in all leagues.
Seth
If you had Teixeira in a non-keeper league, and someone offered you Youkilis or Votto or Gonzo straight up for him, you’d accept?
I’m just curious, I am trying to get Teixeira in a couple leagues and no one is biting.
Also, that’s awfully high for Laroche (borderline crazy actually), I know he is a notorious 2nd half player, but you don’t seem to give Teixeira the same credit.
No doubt, a little crazy
I had all these thoughts when I was ranking, and make no mistake, it was tough. I would accept any of those players for Teixeira.
Every one of those top nine is having a really good season (except Teixeira, of course) and so I was trying to find something that separated them. For me, I noticed that Teixeira’s ISO is way down this year, so it’s not like he is just getting unlucky with HRs. Also, he is among the leaders in home runs that “just made it out.” (They showed the shortest home run of the year on baseball tonight recently—it was Teixeira’s.) So do I think Teixeira is still going to put up good numbers in the second half? Yes. But who am I more sure will put up solid numbers, him or Joey Votto’s? I’d take Votto. Why take the risk with Teixeira if the upside production is so similar? I do think Teixeira’s BA will go up to around .280-.285.
I know it seems a little hypocritical to count LaRoche’s second-half numbers and not Teixeira’s, but Teixeira has not been this bad for the first half in recent years. To me, LaRoche hit 14 HRs in July/Aug/Sept last year. He’s only 30 years old. Now that he’s in Arizona, I feel he can top that. While Arizona is bad, I’m confident its offense will pick it up a little bit.
Maybe I’m a little high on him, but if I miss on LaRoche I’ll bet he’s closer to 11th than he is to 21st.
by Seth Walder on Jun 25, 2010 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions
No love for Garrett Jones?
He’s on pace for .291/22/13/103/74… and is ranked 14th in standard 5×5 leagues.
Also, what about Prado? I realize his 2B and 3B eligibility makes him more valuable at other positions, but he’s still 1B eligible in most leagues, so he should be included no???
Too quiet in Pittsburgh apparently
I didn’t even realize that about Garrett Jones. I don’t know about everyone else, but for me, I would probably put him between Sandoval and Butler (so 16th) right now.
Prado would probably be between 16 and 17 (I think I’d rather have him over Ortiz for 1B), but it’d be hard for me to rank him much higher than that for 1B, since I would have to imagine I would be playing him somewhere else rather than first.
Ohhh
Just realized a “NR” is interpreted as nothing, and the player’s rank is compiled by averaging the other 3 opinions (or 2). A “NR” rank should be assumed as 21, and averaged in as such.
I can't speak for Seth for sure
But it looks like he added 21 for an NR Pena = 12 + 21 + 15 + 15 = 63 / 4 = 15.75
Jones
On second look, I would make Garrett Jones my No. 20, instead of Smoak.
I love Prado, but he just doesn’t make it on this list, just shows how absurdly deep this all is.
And I count the NRs as 21’s, let me know if I messed up anywhere, but I believe I did the math correctly…

by 
































