Who Would You Rather Have: Chad Billingsley or Cole Hamels??
by Ray Guilfoyle on Nov 4, 2009 1:43 PM EST
in Baseball
3 comments
Quick post-both Chad Billingsley and Cole Hamels were drafted pretty high in 2009 drafts, but both underperformed this year. Will both be undervalued in 2010?
Here are their 2009 stats:
| Name | W | L | ERA | GS | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | SO | K/9 | BB/9 | K/BB |
| Chad Billingsley | 12 | 11 | 4.03 | 32 | 196 | 173 | 88 | 17 | 86 | 179 | 8.215 | 3.947 | 2.081 |
| Cole Hamels | 10 | 11 | 4.32 | 32 | 193 | 206 | 93 | 24 | 43 | 168 | 7.826 | 2.003 | 3.907 |
0 recs |
3 comments
|
Email
Print
Comments
wow
a bit surprised so many people chose Billingsley, whose WHIP was around 1.3 even when his ERA was in the low 3’s. I think Hamels suffered a bit of burn out this year, he’ll be back to form in 2010.
by DB11 on Nov 4, 2009 3:00 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
+1
I think they both bounce back in 2010. Maybe the HR’s are pushing voters to Billz? or just alot of Dodgers fans voting?
raygu
by Ray Guilfoyle on Nov 4, 2009 4:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hamels
I would have to take Hamels….we have seen wat he can do, his upside is much higher
by cnubsbl16 on Nov 5, 2009 10:04 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
