Fantasy Football Strategy - Drafting Wide Receivers Late
Eric’s post from yesterday has me thinking about wide receivers. He drafted a team that is weak on WRs in a league that starts 3 WRs and he’s wondering if he’s doomed before the season has started. My answer: no freaking way.
It’s far easier to find wide receivers late in the draft – or on the waiver wire -- than it is to find running backs. In fact, it’s a lot easier than people realize. I usually go weak on WRs because I know it’s possible to grab them later.
I reviewed last season’s Top 20 wide receivers in Receiving Yards and checked to see where they were drafted. I didn’t have average draft position info from last year, so I used the draft results of last year’s SBNation Bloggers Fantasy Football League. That’s as close to a group of football experts as you’ll find anywhere. Also, I realize that receiving yards isn’t the perfect way to rank fantasy WRs, but it’s easy to work with.
Out of the Top 20 WRs, nine of them (45%) were drafted in Round 7 or later. In fact, three of them weren’t drafted at all.
Player
Rec Yards
Round Drafted
Brandon Marshall
1325
9
Braylon Edwards
1289
7
Roddy White
1202
Undrafted
Wes Welker
1175
12
Bobby Engram
1147
Undrafted
Jerricho Cotchery
1130
8
Kevin Curtis
1110
11
Derrick Mason
1087
Undrafted
Joey Galloway
1014
9
Notice that I said it’s possible to grab them later, but that doesn’t mean it’s easy to do it. For every owner who scored by grabbing Roddy White or Bobby Engram late, there’s an owner who flamed out by grabbing Michael Jenkins or Deion Branch late.
It's tough, but it can certainly be done -- nearly half of the Top 20 WRs from last year were available if you knew who to look for. If you find Brady or Manning drops into your lap in the 2nd round and then realize you need a RB2 in the 3rd.. don't worry. If you're prepared and smart (and a little lucky) you can grab great WRs late in your draft.
0 recs |
3 comments
Comments
WR tiers
When are we getting some? I could have used them! :)
Excellent info. Preferable to gamble on WRs or RBs? I sense people are feeling comfortable gambling on RBs now rather than WRS.
by faketeams on
Aug 20, 2008 9:15 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
My instinct
says it is wiser to gamble on RBs, but who’s to say?
Last year, the RBBC strategy screwed me ina few leagues, and with McFadden in Oakland, the glut of RBs in Chicago with Forte, AP2, and Kevin Jones, it seems like a traditonal run heavy team would have very limited fantasy points for any one of the three you end up drafting. I think it stems from this statistic:
The average RB in the NFL only lasts for 2.5 years before he is unable ot continue to compete. I belivee htat is significantly lower than WRs, and why teams use a commitee to ensure the very best runners last longer, which in turn
diminishes their yearly opportunities(carries)
by thomasps3 on
Aug 20, 2008 10:06 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
WR tiers start this weekend!
That’s a good question though. Are there more “reliable” WRs or RBs out there now? I think people gamble on RBs because they’ve “always” gambled on RBs but that doesn’t mean it’s the best option.
Good question, I have to think about that.
by Skeller on
Aug 20, 2008 3:42 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs












